DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! symtym is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

  • Subscribe

  • Community

  • Top Commenters

  • Popular Threads

  • Recent Comments

    • I think "never event" was chosen because it will not be reimbursed (negative compensation). But, with the law of unintended consequences, I suspect it will be used to seek tort compensation.

      10 months ago by symtym

      in » Never Events the New Class Actions? symtym

    • The "Never Event" is unfortunately named. In Australia a list of similar events are called Critical Indicators. I accept that they are preventable, but it is hard to say never in medicine...

      10 months ago by DrCris

      in » Never Events the New Class Actions? symtym

    • I wonder about the full disclosure issues. While I believe in them, I think that we are unnecessarily limiting the scope of disclosure practices to physicians. I believe that lawyers, politicians,...

      1 year ago by raja, MD, MS

      in Your Business

    • We don't already have a two-tiered medical system? One for the well-off, and one for everyone else?

      1 year ago by Chuck McKay

      in Concierge Medicine

    • This is important information, especially for an elderly person on the Medicare part d plan. They don't need any more nasty surprises like being declined for care

      1 year ago by Darwin Corby

      in MRSA: Medicare’s Superbug

symtym

...a physician meandering medicine, law and technology...
Jump to original thread »
Author

Wal-More

Started by symtym · 10 months ago

via del.icio.us


Can Employers Alter Hiring Policies to Cut Health Costs?
An internal Wal-Mart Stores Inc. memo proposing that the retailer cut its health-care costs by discouraging unhealthy people from applying for jobs raises questions about how far employers can legally go in preferen ... Continue reading »

0 comments

This thread has no comments yet.

Please login to comment.
Returning? Login