Community Page
- symtym.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I think "never event" was chosen because it will not be reimbursed (negative compensation). But, with the law of unintended consequences, I suspect it will be used to seek tort compensation.
- The "Never Event" is unfortunately named. In Australia a list of similar events are called Critical Indicators. I accept that they are preventable, but it is hard to say never in medicine...
- I wonder about the full disclosure issues. While I believe in them, I think that we are unnecessarily limiting the scope of disclosure practices to physicians. I believe that lawyers, politicians,...
- We don't already have a two-tiered medical system? One for the well-off, and one for everyone else?
- This is important information, especially for an elderly person on the Medicare part d plan. They don't need any more nasty surprises like being declined for care
symtym
...a physician meandering medicine, law and technology...
Some Hospitals Call 911 to Save Their Patients | NYT | 4.2.07
Should a hospital be able to handle a medical emergency?
The answer may seem self-evident. But patients at some hospitals may find the staff resorting to what someone might do at home in a crisis: call 911 for an ambulance.
That happened recently in Texas, where [...]SHARETHIS.addEntry({ ... Continue reading »
Should a hospital be able to handle a medical emergency?
The answer may seem self-evident. But patients at some hospitals may find the staff resorting to what someone might do at home in a crisis: call 911 for an ambulance.
That happened recently in Texas, where [...]SHARETHIS.addEntry({ ... Continue reading »
2 years ago
2 years ago
I think you are missing the point, it is the physicians and their investors that are acting just like the ones you are indicting, "the legal profession, the insurance cartels, the pharmaceutical companies...." Profit has motivated the creation of specialized hospitals that lack basic safety features.
Your statement, "[t]he issue is not what those with, can afford, but what those without, can not afford[,]" has no logical relevance to the article. Specialty hospitals *only* cater to those with the ability to pay.
This article is, plain and simple, another example of cream-skimming the healthcare dollar, and doing so in a manner that may potentially harm or kill the very clients they seek. Trading a savings for a potential threat is not a wise investment.
As more cases of harm and death mount, Congressional angst will rise and specialty hospitals will become the subject of ever increasing regulatory burden and their profitability may very well vanish. They may die, not because they are not successful, but because they are not safe.
The other side of the coin, which I have touched upon before, is what is the cost of cream-skimming to acute care hospitals and the overall cost to healthcare in the communities served by specialty hospitals. A search in this blog on "specialty hospital" will show several related articles.